Prolonged prone position ventilation is associated with reduced mortality in intubated COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Prone position ventilation (PPV) is resource-intensive, yet the optimal strategy for PPV in intubated patients with COVID-19 is unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does a prolonged (24 or more hours) PPV strategy improve mortality in intubated COVID-19 patients compared to intermittent (∼16 hours with daily supination) PPV? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study of consecutively admitted intubated COVID-19 patients treated with PPV between March 11 - May 31, 2020. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day all-cause mortality and prone-related complications. Inverse probability treatment weights (IPTW) were used to control for potential treatment selection bias. RESULTS: Of the COVID-19 patients who received PPV, 157 underwent prolonged and 110 underwent intermittent PPV. Patients undergoing prolonged PPV had reduced 30-day (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.475, 95% CI 0.336-0.670, P value < 0.001) and 90-day (aHR 0.638, 95% CI 0.461-0.883, P value = 0.006) mortality compared to intermittent PPV. In patients with PaO2/FIO2 ≤ 150 at the time of pronation, prolonged PPV was associated with reduced 30-day (aHR 0.357, 95% CI 0.213-0.597, P value < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (aHR 0.562, 95% CI 0.357-0.884, P value = 0.008). Patients treated with prolonged PPV underwent fewer pronation and supination events (median 1, 95% CI 1-2 versus 3, 95% CI 1-4, P value < 0.001). PPV strategy was not associated with overall PPV-related complications though patients receiving prolonged PPV had increased rates of facial edema and lower rates of peri-proning hypotension. INTERPRETATION: Among intubated COVID-19 patients who received PPV, prolonged PPV was associated with reduced mortality. Prolonged PPV was associated with fewer pronation and supination events and a small increase in rates of facial edema. These findings suggest that prolonged PPV is a safe, effective strategy for mortality reduction in intubated COVID-19 patients.

Cardio- and Neurotoxicity of Selected Anti-COVID-19 Drugs.

Since December 2019, the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has infected ~435 million people and caused ~6 million related deaths as of March 2022. To combat COVID-19, there have been many attempts to repurpose FDA-approved drugs or revive old drugs. However, many of the current treatment options have been known to cause adverse drug reactions. We employed a population-based drug screening platform using 13 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) homozygous human induced pluripotent cell (iPSC) lines to assess the cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity of the first line of anti-COVID-19 drugs. We also infected iPSC-derived cells to understand the viral infection of cardiomyocytes and neurons. We found that iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes express the ACE2 receptor which correlated with a higher infection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (r = 0.86). However, we were unable to detect ACE2 expression in neurons which correlated with a low infection rate. We then assessed the toxicity of anti-COVID-19 drugs and identified two cardiotoxic compounds (remdesivir and arbidol) and four neurotoxic compounds (arbidol, remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and chloroquine). These data show that this platform can quickly and easily be employed to further our understanding of cell-specific infection and identify drug toxicity of potential treatment options helping clinicians better decide on treatment options.